Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

MP

MEI Pharma, Inc. (MEIP)·Q3 2024 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 FY2024 revenue was $0 as collaboration revenue from Kyowa Kirin was fully recognized in prior periods; net loss improved sequentially to $(9.1)M and EPS to $(1.37) from Q2’s $(11.1)M and $(1.66) as OpEx fell to $9.8M .
  • Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments were $56.6M at quarter-end, and management believes liquidity is sufficient for at least 12 months .
  • The Board unanimously prioritized development of voruciclib (CDK9 inhibitor) and decided not to proceed with a second return of capital to conserve cash and extend runway; clinical updates on voruciclib+venetoclax in R/R AML are expected during the remainder of calendar 2024 .
  • Clinical signals remained encouraging: in patients treated with voruciclib≥100 mg plus venetoclax, there were 2 CRi and 1 MLFS responses, biomarker evidence of Mcl‑1 decrease, and no overlapping toxicity with venetoclax; ME‑344 showed a 25% non-progression rate at Week 16 in mCRC Cohort 1, exceeding the pre-specified 20% threshold .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Voruciclib program gained momentum: expansion cohort at 300 mg completed enrollment; initial activity included complete responses (CRi) and MLFS, with anticipated Mcl‑1 decreases at ≥100 mg doses and no overlapping toxicity with venetoclax .
  • ME‑344 combination with bevacizumab in refractory mCRC exceeded the protocol’s 20% non-progression threshold (25% at Week 16), supporting biologic activity; combination was generally well-tolerated .
  • Cost discipline: R&D down to $5.2M (from $15.1M YoY) and G&A down to $4.6M (from $7.2M YoY), driving sequential improvement in net loss and EPS .

Quote: “We anticipate providing updates from the clinical trial evaluating voruciclib in combination with venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory AML…during the remainder of calendar 2024.” — David Urso, President & CEO .

What Went Wrong

  • Revenue dropped to $0 vs $5.9M in Q3 FY2023 as Kyowa Kirin deferred revenue was fully recognized in Q1 FY2024 and the agreement terminated in July 2023 .
  • Continued operating losses and negative operating cash flow ($32.5M over nine months), underscoring financing needs over time despite current runway .
  • Strategic choice not to proceed with a second capital return could disappoint some shareholders seeking near-term cash, though it preserves liquidity for clinical programs .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2023Q2 2024Q3 2024
Revenue ($USD Millions)$5.894 $0.000 $0.000
Net Income (Loss) ($USD Millions)$(15.438) $(11.063) $(9.127)
Diluted EPS ($)$(2.32) $(1.66) $(1.37)
Total Operating Expenses ($USD Millions)$22.285 $11.930 $9.829
R&D Expense ($USD Millions)$15.104 $3.912 $5.220
G&A Expense ($USD Millions)$7.181 $8.018 $4.609
Cash, Cash Equivalents & ST Investments ($USD Millions)N/A$59.5 $56.6
Net Income Margin %N/M (Rev= $5.894; Net= $(15.438)) N/M (Rev= $0) N/M (Rev= $0)

Notes: N/M = Not meaningful when revenue is zero or negative; cash balance presented as combined cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments .

Segment breakdown: Single operating segment; no commercial sales to report .

KPIs

KPIQ1 2024Q2 2024Q3 2024
Voruciclib AML combo – patients enrolled in dose escalation stageCompleted 300 mg cohort enrollment Continued dose escalation; enrollment on track 29 patients; ≥100 mg cohort with 2 CRi, 1 MLFS; 14 SD; biomarker Mcl‑1 decreases; no overlapping toxicity
Voruciclib AML combo – dose expansionPlanned Completed enrollment at 300 mg for 14/28 schedule Dose expansion at 300 mg completed; additional 21/28 schedule being evaluated
ME‑344 + bevacizumab (mCRC) – Week 16 non-progressionEnrollment complete Cohort 1 Planned data in H1’24 25% non-progression; median PFS 1.9 months; combo well-tolerated

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Voruciclib+venetoclax AML – clinical data timingCY2024Initial safety/efficacy data in H1’24 Additional dose escalation/expansion data during remainder of CY2024 Maintained/updated timing
ME‑344 new formulation updateH1 CY2025Develop new formulation; timing TBD Update on formulation efforts in H1 CY2025 Set timing
Capital return (second distribution)FY2024Potential second return up to $9.33M per Cooperation Agreement Board determined not to proceed to conserve resources/extend runway Lowered
Liquidity runwayNext 12 monthsSufficient to fund at least 12 months Sufficient to fund at least 12 months Maintained

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

Note: No Q3 FY2024 earnings call transcript was available for MEIP in our document corpus [List: earnings-call-transcript none for 2024].

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 FY2024 and Q2 FY2024)Current Period (Q3 FY2024)Trend
Voruciclib program focusData expected early CY2024; dose escalation ongoing; strong investigator support Board unanimously prioritizes voruciclib; expansion cohort at 300 mg completed; more data expected rest of CY2024 Strengthening focus
Venetoclax resistance/Mcl‑1 biologyPreclinical/clinical rationale reiterated Anticipated Mcl‑1 decreases observed at ≥100 mg; mutation-agnostic strategy highlighted Reinforced mechanistic validation
ME‑344 clinical pathH1’24 Cohort 1 readout planned 25% Week 16 non-progression; pivot to new formulation; H1 CY2025 update Transition to formulation improvement
Capital allocation & returnsSpecial $1.75/share dividend paid Dec 2023 under Cooperation Agreement; ATM program established No second capital return; conserve cash/runway More conservative
Liquidity/runway & financing12-month runway; may pursue future capital transactions 12-month runway reiterated; potential future capital transactions highlighted Unchanged outlook

Management Commentary

  • Strategic message: “The clinical focus for the rest of the year will be voruciclib…We anticipate providing updates from the clinical trial evaluating voruciclib in combination with venetoclax in patients with relapsed/refractory AML…during the remainder of calendar 2024.” — David Urso, President & CEO .
  • Program positioning: “We believe that voruciclib in combination with venetoclax has potential, as a mutation-agnostic therapy, to benefit the largest number of patients with relapsed/refractory AML.” — David Urso .
  • Capital allocation: Board unanimously aligned on prioritizing voruciclib; enabling ME‑344 new formulation; not proceeding with second capital return to conserve resources and extend runway .

Q&A Highlights

  • No Q3 FY2024 earnings call transcript was available; no Q&A themes identified in the source documents [List: earnings-call-transcript none for 2024].

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q3 FY2024 EPS and revenue was unavailable due to missing CIQ mapping for MEIP; therefore, we cannot assess beats/misses versus estimates at this time. If/when SPGI consensus becomes available, we will anchor comparisons to that dataset.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Liquidity is adequate near term (12+ months), with $56.6M in cash, equivalents, and short-term investments; sequential OpEx reductions improved quarterly loss/EPS despite zero revenue .
  • Clinical execution in AML is the core near-term catalyst: additional voruciclib+venetoclax data (responses, biomarker validation, safety) expected in the remainder of CY2024; dose expansion completed at 300 mg .
  • ME‑344 demonstrated activity in mCRC but strategy pivots to a new formulation with an H1 CY2025 update, reducing near-term readouts from that program .
  • Board’s decision to forego a second capital return extends runway and aligns capital with clinical priorities; expect cautious cash deployment and potential future capital raising .
  • With no estimates available, trading may be driven more by clinical updates and capital allocation decisions than quarterly financial prints; monitor R/R AML expansion cohort outcomes and any ATM usage .
  • Cost structure is resetting post-zandelisib discontinuation, with materially lower R&D and G&A versus prior year; continued discipline supports runway extension .
  • Risk profile remains typical for a clinical-stage biotech: financing needs over time, regulatory uncertainty, and dependence on trial outcomes; position sizing should reflect these dynamics .